Leave a Comment

Comments (12)

Leona 我在想 A Guide to Happiness 的 'happy'非指 快樂 吧 按我的Collins字典 Someone who is 'happy' has feelings of puaselre, usually because something nice has happened or because they feel satisfied with their life. 一個人生活滿足 所以happy 講的會否是 愉快 而非 快樂 愉快 是先有事或人令自己歡愉 像與好朋友相聚或心愛之人一起 感到時間過得很快吧 先愉 後快 為之愉快 我覺得 快樂 很短暫 一瞬間的 像新年IFC煙花放到頂 或性高潮 如果人生日日都追求放煙火或性高潮 那很累吧 所以 你講的會否是 愉快的秘密 快樂的秘密 應該偉哥就OK 意下如何 http://nfcdjxtc.com [url=http://lsgmozk.com]lsgmozk[/url] [link=http://yewxgk.com]yewxgk[/link]
Araceli @ Dec 20, 2015
Dear Charla:Thank you for letting me know that you also reeievcd the RippleCards from Tan Yee Ming, the creator of the RippleCards. We are constantly challenged by the negative emotion. Actually, negative emotion is a self defense reflex. It will always be with us. I also have negative emotion whenever I was disappointed or hurt. It is OK. All you need to do is to take a few big breathes and start the positive self talk to yourself. RippleCards is the self affirmation or positive self talk that I used. I hope you can start this practice by using RippleCards on daily basis.Please be a Ripplemaker,Ping http://urmsie.com [url=http://erzkfwr.com]erzkfwr[/url] [link=http://bnopfrd.com]bnopfrd[/link]
Elena @ Dec 20, 2015
Wham bam thank you, ma'am, my quinoetss are answered! http://lrhziq.com [url=http://joayqw.com]joayqw[/url] [link=http://whmkwl.com]whmkwl[/link]
Takeshi @ Dec 19, 2015
The consumer ecoomny of the united states is dead as of Sept 2008!How is consumerism helping the average Egyptian who is drinking sewage water. I can not fathom why would owning a dvd drive be your measure of happiness or success, while your organs are being destroyed by the poisoned water, food and air resulting from the sada7 mada7 consumer ecoomny of Egypt. http://ysjlbkx.com [url=http://wjjatw.com]wjjatw[/url] [link=http://yqcjkycwar.com]yqcjkycwar[/link]
Human @ Dec 19, 2015
In a general sense aptxlrimapeoy, with time allowing for ever greater precision. Re: imaginary numbers, whether the happiness is relative or absolute comes into question. This ignores the question of free will, though I find the answer to that question to be meaningless in practical terms--sort of akin to Pascal's Wager, you're better living as if you have free will than if you don't, irrespective of the probability of one outlook being more accurate than the other.
Sahar @ Dec 18, 2015
I tend to agree with you and Curly, although to make sure I am clear on this, I have to ask: When you say there is an opimtal formula for each person's happiness/telos, do you mean in a general sense or a specific set of activities?To use a mathematical metaphor, if 1 is considered perfect contentment and your opimtal formula for happiness is f(x) = x^4; 1, -1 and i would all be acceptable solutions. Someone like this could still pursue the 1 path if they were constrained by being born before imaginary or negative numbers had been invented.I guess what I am saying is that I could see how a person could have multiple outlets that would maximize their satisfaction based on their natural abilities and preferences; I don't think this puts me firmly in the blank slatist or absolutist camps.
Julie @ Dec 18, 2015
I tend to agree with you and Curly, although to make sure I am clear on this, I have to ask: When you say there is an opimtal formula for each person's happiness/telos, do you mean in a general sense or a specific set of activities?To use a mathematical metaphor, if 1 is considered perfect contentment and your opimtal formula for happiness is f(x) = x^4; 1, -1 and i would all be acceptable solutions. Someone like this could still pursue the 1 path if they were constrained by being born before imaginary or negative numbers had been invented.I guess what I am saying is that I could see how a person could have multiple outlets that would maximize their satisfaction based on their natural abilities and preferences; I don't think this puts me firmly in the blank slatist or absolutist camps.
Julie @ Dec 18, 2015
I tend to agree with you and Curly, although to make sure I am clear on this, I have to ask: When you say there is an opimtal formula for each person's happiness/telos, do you mean in a general sense or a specific set of activities?To use a mathematical metaphor, if 1 is considered perfect contentment and your opimtal formula for happiness is f(x) = x^4; 1, -1 and i would all be acceptable solutions. Someone like this could still pursue the 1 path if they were constrained by being born before imaginary or negative numbers had been invented.I guess what I am saying is that I could see how a person could have multiple outlets that would maximize their satisfaction based on their natural abilities and preferences; I don't think this puts me firmly in the blank slatist or absolutist camps.
Julie @ Dec 18, 2015
g3Ie3E Useful information. Lucky me I found your website unintentionally, and I am shocked why this coincidence did not came about in advance! I bookmarked it.
crorkservice on fiverr @ May 5, 2015
In a general sense apreoximatply, with time allowing for ever greater precision. Re: imaginary numbers, whether the happiness is relative or absolute comes into question. This ignores the question of free will, though I find the answer to that question to be meaningless in practical terms--sort of akin to Pascal\'s Wager, you\'re better living as if you have free will than if you don\'t, irrespective of the probability of one outlook being more accurate than the other.
Basa @ Aug 28, 2013
that debates about psoprue and telos were often about honor. Perhaps that\'s the driving force behind why people should use their talent. The whole point about cultivating character through the polis isn\'t something that would fly in today\'s multi-culti world, but who knows? Maybe someday we\'ll all come together.I LOVED what he said about the polis, and how people cultivate themselves through practice. It\'s like that with anything. You can\'t be a great guitarist without playing a band, you can\'t be a great blogger without having a place to blog, and you can\'t be a great activist without getting active. You can\'t be a great fighter by only practicing kata. This is also talent related. You can\'t develop talent without exposing it to the world.I\'m also thinking that maybe Talent could also be about contribution. In that parable, the last slave simply doesn\'t contribute. Even if slaves one and two horded their money, people could still say that they contributed by serving as role models.My short notes:debates about psoprue and telos = debates about honoraristotle psoprue is about cultivating charactergood lifeonly fulfill human capacities in polis, use languagevirtue acquired only through practicereminds me of mmagolfgames solely for amusement? honor?if justice is about fit, does it leave room for justice?Mary Katecontribution
Raudexjakane @ Aug 26, 2013
Great video!Thanks guys...r
Robert @ May 19, 2011